Currently in my RTI project we are in the fourth
week. However, we did not get to start the project on time due to the
scheduling conflicts with our current bell schedule. I have met with my school’s
administration to develop the alternative bell schedule, but we decided to go
with our activity bell schedule because maintenance was unable to rework our
bell system. We have noted that next year, we will put the alternative schedule
in at the beginning of the year. The activity bell schedule uses a whole hour for
activity and there are already complaints that the RTI classes are too long and
that it should not be the same subject everyday. We will also try to divide the
time up evenly between the eight classes. For 8th grade class scheduling
we looked at our students previous STAAR scores, district assessment, and six
weeks test scores. Since 8th graders have to pass Math and Reading
to go the next grade, the students that were weak in those areas were assigned
to those classes first. After that, the Science and History teachers selected
students based on the same criteria. Our SPED students were assigned to their
Resource Math or English teachers. Students who did not necessarily need the RTI
were assigned to elective classes for enrichment. For 7th grade
class scheduling we looked at the same criteria and students were split up on
whether they needed help with writing, reading, and math. Each department chair
met with administration to order additional resources for RTI classes. We met with
the Staff during our January staff development and two weeks before we
implemented the program. We didn't end up teaching elective teachers on core
content, because they just ended up working on enrichment activities. We have informally
checked the school climate, but have not done anything formally since we didn't do the 1st two weeks full out. We also haven’t been able to give our
students formal two week assessments. Right now we are getting ready for our
first round of administration, but we will actually change the RTI scheduling
afterwards based on the STAAR results.
Ashley Harper's Action Research
Monday, April 1, 2013
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Updated Action Research Plan
RTI Action Plan
|
||||
Goal: To increase student achievement on
standardized testing and mastery of TEKS.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1. Develop alternative bell schedule.
|
Counselor &
Administration
|
Dec 2012-Jan 2013
|
Master Schedule, List
of all students
|
Review current
activity bell schedule and make adjustments based on faculty input from
department meetings. Principal will give final approval of schedule.
|
2. Create class schedules for RTI.
|
Counselor &
Administration
|
Dec 2012-Jan 2013
|
Previous STAAR scores,
AWARE, District Assessment Scores, 1st 3 six weeks test scores,
teachers input.
|
Teachers will be asked
to review data for their students and make suggestions for students that will
need to be placed in their core class based on their history.
|
3. Criteria for student placement.
|
Administration and RTI
committee
|
Dec 2012-Jan 2013
|
Previous STAAR scores,
AWARE, District Assessment Scores, 1st 3 six weeks test scores,
teachers input.
|
RTI committee will
come up with criteria for class placement. What will be the cut-off for
student placement? Ex. Students who score below 70 on tests, etc.
|
4. Research and Analyze Assignments/
Activities for
RTI period
|
Administration, Department
Chairs
|
Dec 2012-May 2013
|
STAAR Coach, Explore
Learning, Adaptive Curriculum, Textbooks, Labs
|
Department Chairs will
need to make sure that the RTI activities are rigorous, relevant, and
engaging.
|
5. Hold faculty meeting to discuss
implementation.
|
Administration
|
Dec 2012
|
Master Schedule
|
Principal will hold
meeting to go over the RTI program.
|
6.
6.
Train elective teachers in content they will teach.
|
Department Chairs
|
Jan 2013-May 2013
|
Depends on content
area. For example, Science teacher will train elective teacher on how to use
Adaptive Curriculum, etc.
|
Core teachers will
make sure elective teachers feel comfortable with the information.
|
7. School Climate Check
|
RTI Committee
|
Jan 2013
|
Survey
|
Teachers will be
surveyed the 1st two weeks to iron out any issues with the new
program.
|
8. Review Progress Checks
|
All teachers
|
Bi-weekly from Jan 2013-May2013
|
2 weeks assessments,
AWARE
|
Teachers will review 2
weeks assessments to check on student progression.
|
9. Conduct Teacher Survey
|
Ashley Harper
|
May 2013
|
Survey
|
Survey teachers on
overall success and possible improvements for schedule change.
|
10. STAAR Results
|
Admin
|
May 2013
|
STAAR Reports
|
STAAR Reports
|
11. Conduct Student Survey
|
Ashley Harper
|
Jan 2013-May 2013
|
Survey
|
Students will be
surveyed bi-weekly to see what could be done to enhance the program. Do they
feel it is beneficial? Is there something missing that they feel they could
grow from?
|
12. Force Field Analysis
|
Admin & Ashley
Harper
|
Dec 2012-Jan 2013
|
Identified past and
present issues.
|
Meet as a team to go over
possible issues that would disrupt the program. Make sure our driving forces
are stronger than our resisting forces.
|
13. Delphi Method
|
Ashley Harper
|
Dec 2012-Jan 2013
|
Survey
|
Conduct a survey
amongst all teachers regarding the new implementation and what needs to be
done. Compile a list of the issues and resend to staff to come to a consensus
on how to address the implementation.
|
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Week 2 Action Research Reflection
This week I have learned that teachers have to be action research oriented. The research we do needs to be practical and can be applied to my learning environment. When choosing an action research topic, I have to make sure that:
1. I do not focus my action research question on controlling or changing other people's practices. The only person I can control is myself and my action research question should be a self-discovery for my practices.
2. I take the time to discover a true passion so that it will sustain me through the process.
3. I focus on something that pertains to my building.
4. I ask for help from other colleagues.
5. I allow my question to change and evolve over time as I engage in the process.
In this day and age, teachers have to be data driven. I have to use data to impact my instruction on a daily basis and my action research should be data driven as well.
1. I do not focus my action research question on controlling or changing other people's practices. The only person I can control is myself and my action research question should be a self-discovery for my practices.
2. I take the time to discover a true passion so that it will sustain me through the process.
3. I focus on something that pertains to my building.
4. I ask for help from other colleagues.
5. I allow my question to change and evolve over time as I engage in the process.
In this day and age, teachers have to be data driven. I have to use data to impact my instruction on a daily basis and my action research should be data driven as well.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Use of blogs
Educational leaders
might use blogs as a data collection tool, for their own professional development,
to inform others on improvement efforts and what’s going on at the school, and
to capture their thinking of inquiry as it unfolds. It can be for collaboration
and receiving support from other peers. Principals can write their feelings,
ideas, and experiences and receive feedback from numerous educators around the
world. Blogs can also be used as a reflective tool.
What I've learned about action research
I have learned that action research is a process like the
scientific method where educators research the best way to improve teaching
practices and student learning. It helps teachers with their professional
development and accountability. The first thing you have to do with action
research is identify a problem/ pose a question. Once, the problem is
identified the educator will research the problem by reading different
literature relating to the topic and coming up with ideas and ways to fix the
problem. The educator will then try their new idea/technique. They will collect
data and analyze this information. If the results are successful, then they will
share their results with others, however, if the results are not what they
expected, then they will have to go back and work on either revise or coming
up with a new technique/idea to try and test it out.
Action research is different than the traditional educational
research because it pertains to the educator’s particular campus versus a
generic format. Action research can take place in various educational settings.
Educators can either participate in action research as part of
university/college coursework, superintendent/district meetings, leadership teams,
or professional learning communities.In the university/college coursework
setting, the educator either writes a proposal for an action research project
or conducts the research as part of their curriculum. In the
superintendent/district meetings, the educator works with other colleagues on a
monthly basis completing interactive tasks that helps then identify an area of
study to help them with their own practices. In the leadership team setting,
the educator works with other faculty members on their campus where they share
problems/ideas, responsibilities, and decision making. In the professional
learning community setting, the educator works with other faculty members like
the leadership team, however the meetings are more structured and the action
research is a continuous cycle.
I could definitely use
it in my classroom. Science tends to be a hard concept for students to grasp.
We are always trying new methods and techniques to help students internalize
what we teach. I would love to be able to identify the main problem with my
student’s learning and to be able to help them learn better. As Department
Chair, I would be very pleased if I could find a way to help my team teach our
students more effectively. Right now my district is moving toward teaching all
3rd-8th graders with PBLs (problem-based learning) 90% of
the time. I’m interested in seeing if the students actually do learn better
this way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)